Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisor Osherson, Daniel N.
dc.creatorSides, Ashley Ellen
dc.date.accessioned 2009-06-04T08:30:11Z
dc.date.available 2009-06-04T08:30:11Z
dc.date.issued 2000
dc.identifier.citation Sides, Ashley Ellen. "The conjunction fallacy under probability and betting instructions." (2000) Master’s Thesis, Rice University. https://hdl.handle.net/1911/17378.
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1911/17378
dc.description.abstract Researchers have tried to keep subjects from committing the conjunction fallacy since Tversky and Kahneman discovered it in 1983. Betting paradigms (Bar-Hillel, 1993) have been used to force subjects to use a mathematical interpretation of "probability", but past experiments have either not involved actual betting or have had subjects bet on fictitious situations. In the current experiments half of the subjects were asked to decide which of 2 statements (about future events) had a higher probability while the other half were asked which statement they would prefer to bet on (in view of an actual payoff). The hypothesis was that while subjects in the probability condition would commit the conjunction fallacy, those in the betting condition would not. This hypothesis was not supported---there was not a significant difference between the numbers of conjunction fallacies committed by subjects in the two conditions in either of two experiments.
dc.format.extent 32 p.
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf
dc.language.iso eng
dc.subjectCognitive psychology
dc.title The conjunction fallacy under probability and betting instructions
dc.type Thesis
dc.type.material Text
thesis.degree.department Psychology
thesis.degree.discipline Social Sciences
thesis.degree.grantor Rice University
thesis.degree.level Masters
thesis.degree.name Master of Arts


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record