PREFACE

The traveller who visits the
temples of the Nile has
not seen all the art of ancient Egypt:
he must
supplement his view of the monuments by a study of
the matchless collections of the Gīza Museum. In
the same way, it is not enough to make the round of
the mosques of
Cairo:
one must also visit the Arab
Museum. As the Gīza collections
illustrate the
ancient art by their classified series of
objects found
in the tombs or rescued from the sand, so the
Arab
Museum contains those remains of the Saracenic art
of the past twelve centuries which have been gathered
from the ruins of vanished mosques and palaces.
The introduction of a bastard European style, the
laying out of new streets, and the broadening of old
ones, during the past fifty years, are responsible for
more havoc among the monuments of Saracenic art
than the centuries of former neglect. The street
fights of Mamlūk Beys and Turkish Pashas did less
damage to the mosques of
Cairo than the futile
attempt to Europeanize a
medieval Eastern city.
The ruins of demolished buildings
became the happy
hunting-ground of collectors and dealers, and
the
Museums of Europe and the houses of dilettanti are
full of the spoils.
At last the Government of Egypt, which had already
placed restrictions upon the exportation of the relics
of
ancient art, began to take notice of the spoliation of
the
Mohammadan monuments, and concert measures
for the
preservation of the remains of the national
art. There was a
project for an Arab Museum in
1869, when the Khedive Isma'īl
authorized Franz
Pasha, then chief architect of the Ministry
of Wakfs,
to select a suitable building; but the plan fell
through, and it was not till 1880 that the East
arcades (or līwān) of the
Mosque of El-Hākim were
appropriated to the reception of
objects of Saracenic
art. The task of organizing the new
Museum was
again placed in the able hands of Franz Pasha,
who
in 1883 removed it to its present place in the
court
of the same mosque.
With the appointment, at the close of 1881, of the
the “Commission for the Preservation of the Monuments
of Arab
Art,” the Museum entered upon a new
and more active phase.
Among the leading members
of this Commission were scholars,
archaeologists,
and architects, such as His Excellency
Yakub Artin
Pasha, the present Under Secretary for Public
Instruction,
Franz Pasha, the late Rogers Bey, and
MM. Bourgoin, Baudry, and Grand Bey; besides
the English officials of the department of Public
Works,
first Sir Colin Scott Moncrieff, and now
Mr. W. E. Garstin.
The Commission, to which
alone we owe the present greatly
improved supervision
and preservation of the mosques and
other

buildings of
Cairo and elsewhere in Egypt, was
empowered by the late Khedive not only to watch
over the monuments and execute such repairs as
were necessary to their preservation, but also to
transport to the Arab Museum any fragments or
detached objects of artistic or historical value which
could not be protected in their original position.
The ruins
of mosques and palaces, which were beyond
the resources of
restoration, were carefully searched
for such remains, and
these form the chief materials
of the collections now
exhibited in the Museum.
The objects differ essentially from those in most
public collections, inasmuch as they are nearly all
relative,—dependent upon the monument to which
they once
belonged,—and were seldom designed as
separate works of art.
All Saracenic art is decorative,
or subsidiary to
architecture; and the collections
of the Arab Museum consist
mainly of portions
of the decoration and furniture of mosques
and
private houses,—such as carved and inlaid doors,
sculptured stone and plaster ornament, painted
ceiling-joists,
bronze filigree plating, marble mosaic,
and
other substantive parts of the architectural
decoration,
every piece of which was designed in
relation
to the main structure. Even detached objects,
like
the splendid series of enamelled glass lamps,
which
is the special glory of the Museum, and the
exquisite
filigree bronze tables inlaid with silver,
however
beautiful in themselves, were strictly connected
with
some mosque and in harmony with its decorative

style. But
this relativity of the Arab Museum collections
in no wise
detracts from their beauty or
interest. On the contrary, it is
only from such
specimens of ornament as are there preserved
that
we are able to study some of the more obscure
periods
of Saracenic art. The Museum contains fragments
which reveal the style and ornament of several
vanished mosques of periods hardly represented by
any standing monuments. And whilst the carved
and inlaid panelling of a door, or the rich colouring
of a
ceiling, inevitably reminds one of the irreparable
loss of the
building it once adorned, each individual
panel or painted
joist is itself a marvel of artistic
design and skilled
handicraft, and suggests valuable
motives and developments to
the student of
ornament.
To study connectedly the history of Saracenic
ornament as elaborated in Egypt, the Museum requires
to be
arranged in strict chronological order.
This is manifestly
impossible in the present crowded
building, already
overflowing into two annexes.
Plans for a new Museum, with
which the Khedivial
Library will be combined, have been
approved, however,
and by 1898 we may hope to see these
unique
collections worthily housed.
Meanwhile the present catalogue provides ample
evidence of the historical and technical knowledge
which Herz
Bey, who has been curator of the
Museum under the Commission
since 1892, is qualified
to bring to the arrangement and
explanation of

the
collections in his charge. His constant and
zealous energy in
the work of preserving the Arab
monuments, as chief architect
to the Commission, has
earned him the gratitude of every lover
of Cairene
art; and the present catalogue increases the
debt.
The original edition appeared in French in 1895;
but it was felt that the large and yearly increasing
number of English and American visitors to the
Museum called for an English version. The catalogue
in its present form has been somewhat condensed:
Herz Bey's valuable introductions to the
various sections have been in some degree recast; the
orthography of Arabic names has been made uniform
with that
adopted in my
Art of the Saracens, and
the
Egyptian sound of hard
g is used for the letter
jīm;
but
in other respects the catalogue itself is
substantially
unchanged. I hope it will induce every
English and
American visitor to study the exquisite national
art
of medieval Egypt, of which the Arab Museum,
after the mosques, offers the most complete representation
now attainable in
Cairo. The study may be
continued with advantage among
the rich Saracenic
collections of the British and South
Kensington
Museums, which present many objects of rare
interest and beauty.
STANLEY LANE-POOLE
The Athenaeum,
Pall Mall,
1 Jan., 1896
INTRODUCTION

Although the conquest of Egypt
by the Saracens
was completed in 641, we have no Arab
monument,
still standing in its original form, of an
earlier date
than 876. During these two hundred and
thirty-five
years of artistic silence, Egypt was merely a
province
administered by a succession of governors
appointed
by the Omayyad and 'Abbāsid Caliphs who had
their
seats at Damascus and
Baghdād. The capital of
Egypt was a
provincial town, and no temporary
governor, except its first
conqueror,
1 cared to waste
1 'Amr's great mosque, founded at
the conquest for the
new capital called El-Fustāt, ‘The
Tent,’ after the general's
pavilion, has unfortunately so
often fallen to ruin and been
restored, that scarcely
anything of the original building can
be proved to remain;
and it supplies no evidence for the
history of Arab art.
See E. K. Corbet Bey, ‘The History
of the Mosque of ‘Amr,’
in Journ. R. Asiatic Society, vol.
xxii. N.S., 1891. The only other monument prior to 876
is the mikyās or
nilometer at Rōda, which has a kufic
inscription of the
date of its restoration by the Caliph
El-Mamūn when he
visited Egypt in 217 A.H.=832 A.D.

upon it the
wealth, and labour necessary for great
monuments.
Where no monuments are
built, Arab art cannot flourish: for
to
the Saracens architecture was
the art
par
excellence,
and all other branches of art were merely
its handmaidens.
Sculpture, painting, carving, inlaying,
glass-work, were all cultivated mainly as auxiliaries
to architecture. Hence, the period of mere governors
is sterile not only in architecture but in the subsidiary
arts, and but for a number of tombs discovered
among the rubbish-mounds south of
Cairo we should
be without any early
evidence as to the origin of the
Arab style. The ornament,
especially in woodcarving,
of these tombs, however, shows
beyond
doubt that in the first centuries of the Hijra
the
Byzantine decorative manner prevailed in Egypt
among Arabs, as among Copts; though as time
went on the Muslims gave it a new development
which made their
architecture and all their arts
individual expressions of
their genius.
In 868 Ahmad ibn Tūlūn, the son of a Turkish
slave
of Bokhārā in the service of the Caliph El-Mamūn,
was
appointed governor of Egypt, and in
the following year he
declared himself an independent
ruler. With
him begins the
history of Egypt as a distinct Mohammadan
Power, and his mosque—which was but one
of
the many splendid, but alas! Vanished, buildings
with which he
adorned his new
faubourg ‘El-Katā‘i,’

N.E. of
Fustāt—inaugurates the history of Saracenic
architecture in
Egypt. The mosque of Ibn-Tūlūn,
built in 876—878, is familiar
to every visitor to
Cairo. Its great court surrounded by
cloisters, with
deeper rows of arches at the east or Mecca
side
(
līwān), is a
type of the earlier plan of
Cairo
mosques
—a plan which was copied for centuries, even
after
other plans had come into vogue. The whole
building is of plastered brick, except the curious
corkscrew tower which, with some later additions, is
of faced stone.
1 The massive piers are
ornamented
with engaged columns, the bases of which are
imitations
of ancient models. The capitals are
campanulate,
and the decorative foliage bears some
relation
to the acanthus. These and other details, such
as
the wavy pattern of the bordering of the arches, the
mosaic plateband above the prayer-niche (
mihrāb),
etc., point to the dominating
influence of Byzantine
models, and identical ornament may be
seen in some
of the early tomb-carvings referred to above.
On
1 The only minaret standing, of the
two originally placed
at either end of the līwān wall, is of brick. The large
stone tower in masonry and various architectural
details
appear to belong to a different period from
the rest of the
mosque. [Its remarkable resemblance,
however, to one
other monument, and one only, the
corkscrew tower of
Samarrā, built during the Caliphs'
residence there in the
IIIrd c. of the Hijra, justifies
the belief that there was an
original tower of the same
form. See the woodcut of the
Samarrā tower in Rich's Kurdistan, vol. ii., p. 151.—Ed.]

the other
hand, on the intrados of some of the arches,
where the
original ornament is still preserved, we
find already in the
IXth century polygonal designs
mixed with true arabesques,
which are not Byzantine
at all, but typically Saracenic.
The Tūlūnid dynasty, despite the promise of its
birth, withered away in 36 years. A succession of
thirteen
governors for the Caliph again reduced
Egypt for 30 years to
the subordinate position of a
province; and though the
Ikhshīdid dynasty maintained
its independence in Egypt and
Syria for 36
years
more, its princes never found the settled peace
and leisure
necessary for the undertaking of artistic
monuments; even
their tombs were at Damascus.
There is not a vestige of any
art during this interval.
But
in 969 Gōhar, the general of the
Fātimid Caliph El-Mu'izz of
Kayrawān,
conquered Egypt, and with the accession of the
new
dynasty Egypt took its place as the most powerful
oriental State on the Mediterranean. The Fātimids
had already been great builders at Kayrawān, Mahdīya,
and in Sicily: they did not abandon the taste
when they transferred their capital to the new site
of
El-Kāhira, ‘the Victorious,’ italianated
into
Cairo
, which they founded immediately after the
conquest.
El-Kāhira was originally no city but only
the new Caliphs'
vast fortress-palace—or rather pair
of palaces—surrounded by
the houses of their officers
and slaves, and enclosed with
massive walls. The

palaces have
long vanished, but some of the gates
of the walls remain in
the places where they were
built by Bedr El-Gemāly for the
Caliph El-Mustansir
in 1087: they are the Norman-looking
Bāb-en-Nasr
and
Bāb-el-Futūh, close to the Arab Museum, and
the Bāb-Zuweyla in
the Sukarīya. Of the mosques
of the Fātimid period (969—1171)
there still remain
the great university mosque El-Azhar (‘the
Splendid’),
the mosque of El-Hākim (in the court of which
the
Museum has its temporary asylum), the small mosque
El-Akmar, and that of Talāi' ibn Ruzzīk, vezīr of the
last Fātimid Caliph.
Of these the oldest is the
Azhar (971), but it has been so
often restored that
its original features are considerably
obscured. The
keel-form of the arches is characteristic of
Fātimid
work, though we find the pointed form on the
next
mosque, the ruined El-Hākim (990—1012), which
in this and many other respects (e.g. carvings on
wooden ties of piers, and of the door, see below,
Passage No. 1) resembles the style of Ibn-Tūlūn.
The mosque of Talāi'
ibn Ruzzīk (1159) near the
Bāb-Zuweyla, shows a marked advance
in decoration.
The simple arabesques of El-Hākim's
inscriptional
friezes have here developed into rich detail
which
gives the effect of filigree-work. Indeed the art
of
arabesque ornament as seen in the ruins of this
beautiful mosque has reached a perfection which is
not surpassed by any later decoration in
Cairo. The
mosque El-Akmar in the
Sūk-en-Nahhāsīn built by

the Caliph
El-āmir in 1125, small and ruined as it
is, has the feature,
unique among Fātimid mosques,
of a fine façade (unfortunately
hidden by a formless
erection which the Monuments Commission
has
vainly sought to obtain power to remove) very
unlike
the ordinary plain exterior of the early mosques,
and
deserving special notice for the shell ornament of
its
fluted niche, the rosette of open tracery composed of
inscriptions
and ornament, and the side niches,
surmounted by a kufic
frieze. Moreover, the angle
of this mosque shows the earliest
example of that
mode of stalactite transition which afterwards
became
a chief characteristic of Saracenic architecture
in
Egypt.
The last Fātimid Caliph was deposed by Saladin
(Salāh-ed-dīn
Yūsuf ibn Ayyūb), who
founded the dynasty of the Ayyūbids
(1172—1250), fortified the citadel of
Cairo, built his
palace there (no
longer existing), and enlarged the
circuit of the city walls.
The influence of the
Crusaders, who had covered
Syria with fortresses,
and with whom Saladin was constantly at war, may
be traced in
the military architecture of his dynasty.
Another influence
was the return of the Government
of Egypt from the Shī'ism of
the Fātimids to orthodox
Sunnism. In order to encourage
orthodoxy, the
Ayyūbids founded a number of theological
colleges
(
medresa), in
which the religion of Islām, as taught
by the Four Doctors,
was systematically expounded.

These
medresas are really mosques, with an open
court in the centre, and a prayer-niche (
mihrāb),
pulpit, etc. in the eastern
līwān or sanctuary at the
side towards Mecca; but instead of cloisters round
the court, the sanctuary and the three other sides
are formed by arched transepts or porches, open to
the court, which give a cruciform appearance to the
building. In these four porches, divines expounded
respectively the Shāfi'ite, Mālikite, Hanafite, and
Hanbalite systems of Mohammadan theology. This
cruciform plan afterwards became usual for small
mosques, as well as for medresas, though the older
cloistered form was still preserved for the great
congregational mosques (
gāmi') used for Friday
prayers.
1
1 In El-Makrīzy's Khitat, or ‘Topography of Cairo,’ etc.,
the distinction
between the gāmi' (congregational
mosque),
mesgid (small mosque), medresa, etc., is carefully observed,
and so it was when Lane wrote his Modern
Egyptians,
1836; but in the present day the
people of Cairo call any
sort of mosque a gāmi', or, roughly, gama.
The oldest
medresa still in
existence
2 is that of
El-Kāmil, the nephew of
Saladin, built in 1224, but
now an utter ruin, where only the
plan can just be
traced. Some remains of the decoration are in
the
Museum (Room I, nos. 83—87) and serve as complement
2 The earliest medresa, the
Nāsirīya, founded by Saladin
near the mosque of 'Amr,
where the Shāfi'ite doctrine was
taught, has disappeared.

to those of
Talāi'. The college of Es-Sālih,
1242, and adjoining mosque, are also ruins, but
some characteristic details remain: e.g. the façade
with shell-ornament like El-Akmar, new stalactite
forms, especially in the minaret (part of which,
however, is restored), toothed borders, etc. Great
progress had been made in the construction of domes,
the angles of which were masked by a series of
niches, as may be seen in the adjoining tomb of
Es-Sālih (1249) and that of the Imām Esh-Shāfi'y
(1211). In the former one traces western influences,
especially in the introduction of a false gorge
sculptured with foilage, in the
entablature of the
façade. The wood-carvings of the tomb show
a
greater delicacy than anything we have of the
Fātimid period (even the beams of Talāi'), and it is
much to be
regretted that we have no monuments
between the two by which
we could trace the growth
of this branch of art, which was
cultivated with
peculiar success in Egypt. The sober marble
panelling of Es-Sālih's tomb also deserves notice, as
contrasting with the more elaborate dados of a later
epoch.
With the Mamlūk Sultāns of the Bahry or Turkish
dynasty (1250—1382) we enter upon the richest and
most
flourishing period of Saracenic
art and
architecture. 'The Mamlūks
offer the most singular contrasts
of
any series of princes in the world. A band of

lawless
adventurers, slaves in origin, butchers by
choice, turbulent,
bloodthirsty, and too often treacherous,
these slave kings had
a keen appreciation
for the arts, which would have done credit
to the
most civilized ruler that ever sat on a
constitutional
throne. Their morals were indifferent,
their conduct
violent and unscrupulous, yet they show in
their buildings, their decoration, their dress, and
their furniture, a taste and refinement which it
would be hard to parallel in western countries even
in the present aesthetic age. It is one of the most
singular facts in Eastern history, that wherever
these rude Tartars penetrated, there they inspired a
fresh and vivid enthusiasm for art. It was the
Tartar Ibn-Tūlūn who built the first example of the
true Saracenic mosque at
Cairo; it was the line of
Mamlūk Sultāns, all
Turkish or Circassian slaves,
who filled
Cairo with the most beautiful and abundant
monuments that any city can show.'
1
1 Lane-Poole,
Cairo
, pp. 95—97.
There was a transitional period, at first, before the
true Mamlūk architectural style was formed. In the
mouldings of the great mosque of Ez-Zāhir Beybars
(1268), the
façades of Kalāūn's monuments, etc., we
have signs of exotic
influences; whilst the Gothic
portal from a church at Acre,
bodily transported to
form the doorway of the medresa of
En-Nāsir in the
Sūk-en-Nahhāsīn, shows alike an appreciation
of

foreign
styles and an indifference to artistic consistency.
But these
exotic influences from
Syria and elsewhere soon found their true place and
became assimilated, so far as they were harmonious,
in the
rapidly developing Mamlūk style. The long
reign of over forty
years (1299—1341) of En-Nāsir
Mohammad, son of Kalāūn, gave
time for the work
of selection, adaptation, and precision, to
which the
admirable style of the numerous mosques erected
by
by En-Nāsir, his sons, and the officers of his
court,
bears witness. The abounding energy of this
productive
epoch bore the happiest results for art.
The hesitating experiments of the earlier period
gave place to a rare distinctness of architectural
conception. Despite a remarkable variety and incomparable
wealth of form and combination, the
unity
of design stands clearly out and reveals a
finished and
singularly adequate style.
In the arrangement of the façade, which is now of
freestone, generally in two shades, the materials of
previous
centuries are developed and emphasized;
the larger surfaces
are given perspective by a system
of high shallow niches in
which the windows are
set in double rows; these niches are
brought back
to the face above by stalactite cornices, and
the
portals, though wider and deeper, are treated in
the
same way and richly coated with marble. A long
inscriptional frieze spreads across the façade, and
the top is crowned by a crenellated moulding. The

general plan
of the mosque is the same as in previous
periods, sometimes of
the cloistered type with
marble columns, but more commonly
cruciform;
but a new importance is given to the founder's
tomb,
always covered by a dome, which is, indeed, the
characteristic mark of a tomb-mosque.
1 The spring
of the arches round the court is set higher than
before. The joists of the wood roof are magnificently
carved, painted, and gilt. The wainscots or dado
are of marble mosaic, often to the height of several
yards, and the pavements are tessellated in bold
and striking mosaics. The rich and harmonious
effect of the interior is enhanced by the panelled
and
inlaid pulpit (
minbar), lectern (
kursy el-kahf),
bronze
lanterns, and enamelled glass lamps. And,
from the few remains
that have come down to us,
none unfortunately at all complete,
it is clear that
the palaces and private houses of the Mamlūk
age
hardly fell short of the mosques in the beauty and
elaboration of their form and decoration.
1 Lane-Poole, Art of the Saracens in Egypt, p. 60.
The accession of the Burgy or Circassian line of
Mamlūks (1382—1517) introduced no fresh element
of importance
in the architecture, which continued
its natural development
without interruption or
external interference. The mosques in
the fifteenth
century are more and more restricted to the
cruciform
plan and become smaller, which allowed the

central court
to be covered in. A number of
secondary institutions were
added to the mosque and
filled up the spaces between its
porches and the
streets,—such as theological colleges, public
fountains
(
sebīl),
elementary schools (
kuttāb), lavatories,
and rooms for the mosque attendants. The school
is an almost universal feature of Circassian Mamlūk
mosques, and occupies as a rule one of the most
conspicuous angles of the building, where its gracefully
arched window may be seen high up. It first
occurs in this position in the mosque of El-Gāy el-Yūsufy
(1372). The founder's tomb was also given
greater prominence.
Instead of being relegated to a
corner of the mosque, as under
most of the Bahry
Mamlūks, it is often the principal feature,
or commonly
forms a separate and complete monument. Stone
was
more generally employed, even for internal walls,
which no less than the façade were covered with
arabesques, geometrical designs, and kufic inscriptions,
every inch of which is worthy of study. As
the mosques of this period are smaller and more
decorated than
before, so the private houses are
more
coquettes. The
mak'ad
on its two arches overhangs
the court, and the
kā'a or salon is adorned
with mosaics and a richly gilt and painted ceiling,
softly
lighted by the graceful
meshrebīya
lattice.
Many
wekālas
(
khāns or caravanserais), fountains,
etc., like those of Kāït-Bey, are monuments of
rare artistic merit. External decoration reached

its highest
point of elaboration under the Circassian
Mamlūks.
When Egypt became in 1517 a province of the
Ottoman
Empire, its art took wings and departed.
The 'Othmānlis
imported the form of the Byzantine
church, and gave a new
importance to the dome,
but brought no real artistic
inspiration. Among
the Turkish mosques may be mentioned that
of
Suleymān Pasha (1523), near the tomb of the saint
Sāriyat-el-Gebel in the Citadel, and those of Sinān
Pasha at Būlāk (1571) and Malika
Safiya (1610).
A few mosques were
still erected by Egyptians
more or less after the Mamlūk
style; but the
tendency was in favour of buildings of less
importance,
such as fountains, schools, caravanserais,
and
darwīsh convents. The
sebīls of the Turkish period
especially form a
notable feature in the streets, and
are independent buildings,
no longer subordinate
to mosques. Ornament suffered an
eclipse; the rich
decoration of Kāït-Bey gave place to a
simple and
cheap manner significant of artistic and
pecuniary
poverty. An exception is seen in the buildings
and
restorations of the admirable 'Abd-er-Rahmān Kikhya
(properly Ketkhuda), whose fountain, for example
(1744), is chiefly in the Arab style and stands far
above all contemporary Turkish work, which is
generally beneath contempt. It is devoutly to be
wished
that the political and industrial revival which
was
inaugurated by the illustrious founder of the

present
dynasty, the great Mohammad 'Aly, may
find its corollary in a
renaissance of that artistic
fertility which was once among
the glories of
Muslim Egypt.
HERZ
CATALOGUE
OF THE
NATIONAL
MUSEUM OF ARAB ART
ROOM I.
Stucco, Stone, and Marble Work

Stucco was used in the Arab art
of Egypt from the
earliest times as a material for
architectural ornament.
We find examples in the oldest extant
Mohammadan
monument, the mosque of Ibn-Tūlūn,
built in A.D. 876-8, which, in spite of its thorough
restoration in 1296, retains a portion of its original
stucco decoration. In the XIIIth century stucco
reached its highest perfection in
Cairo, when the
tomb of Kalāūn and the
medresa or collegiate mosque
of his son En-Nāsir (1299) furnish admirable examples
of profuse decoration in this material. The
stucco ornaments nos. 83-87, however, are of an
earlier date,
for they formed part of the framing of a
window of the
long-ruined mosque of the Ayyūbid
Sultān El-Kāmil, nephew of
Saladin, which was
built in 1224, and of which, according to
the late
James Wild, two sides were still standing in 1845

and displayed
ornament which resembled that of the
Alhambra.
1
These fragments, nos. 83-87, show us
how the plaster was
worked. We see at once that
the design was cut in the solid
block and that
the decoration is in two distinct planes: the
ornament
of the first plane was finished first, and
then
the parts in relief were added in a second layer.
Stucco decoration was used at all periods, even
when sculptured stone held the first place: compare
the kufic frieze of the stateliest of
Cairo mosques,
that of Sultān Hasan
(1358), and the beautiful
ornament of the dome of Aksunkur
(1347) in the
Darb-el-Ahmar. In the second half of the XVth
century stucco was less popular than stone, but the
Kubbet el-Fidāwīya in the suburb of 'Abbāsīya,
which belongs to this period, shows, by the profuse
stucco ornamentation of the whole of the interior to
the very apex of the dome, that the art had not
been lost or degraded, and that the method of cutting
out the designs was the same as in earlier times.
1 Lane-Poole, Art of the Saracens, p. 53. There is no
doubt that the internal decoration of the tomb-mosque
of
Kalāūn and a window in the south arcades of the
mosque
of El-Muayyad bear a striking resemblance to
Moorish
ornament.
Stucco was also used for filling in windows, in
two
ways: the first and more ancient is the
clairevoie or open tracery window cut out of a
thick
layer of plaster, often with very happy effect, in
a
great variety of designs. This method was used
until the close of the XIIIth century. Examples

may be seen
in the mosques of Ibn-Tūlūn
1 and El-Hākim,
and the
ruined but magnificent mosque of
Ez-Zāhir Beybars, where
remains of richly designed
tracery still stand out here and
there in the roughly
blocked-up bays. The Māristān (hospital)
of Kalāūn
has also some fine and well-preserved gratings of
cut plaster. This kind was used to fill the window-bays
of mosques of the cloistered style; or, when
mosques were entirely closed-in (as the Māristān or
those
of Kāït-Bey etc.) they served to protect the
glazed windows
proper, which were inside. These
glazed windows (
kamarīya ‘moonlights’ or
shemsīya ‘sunlights’) are not found
before the second half of
the XIIIth c., and are of two kinds.
In the earlier
kind (say 1250-1330), after the design was cut
in the
plaster, the pieces of thick coloured glass were
laid
on the face so as to cover the holes, and were
fixed
in their places by little rims of plaster which
followed
the lines of the pattern. Examples may be seen
at
the tombs of Es-Sālih and Kalāūn and the sepulchral
mosque of Sengar el-Gāwaly (1323). In the
later style of
kamarīya, of the XIVth and
XVth c.,
the little rims are omitted, and the glass is fixed
to
the back of the stucco by pouring a coat of liquid
plaster between the pieces of glass. There are
examples in the medresa of Barkūk in the Sūk-en-Nahhāsīn
(1384), in buildings of the epoch of Kāït-Bey
1 Probably not of the date of the
foundation, but of the
restoration in 1296: they are too
bold and decided to belong
to the earlier date; but they
undoubtedly replaced older
stucco gratings.

(end of XVth
c.), the mosques of Abū-Bekr ibn
Mazhar, Kigmās el-Ishāky,
etc. The glass of these
later windows is sometimes extremely
thin. The
kamarīya of recent centuries will not bear
comparison
with the older specimens: the designs become
poor,
the execution coarse, and the colours (which had
then to be imported, for lack of local materials) thin
and inharmonious.
Freestone was not generally
employed by the Saracenic
architects of Egypt, in place of
brick or rubble,
till a rather late date, notwithstanding the
examples
set before their eyes in the stone buildings of
the
ancient Egyptians. It is true that the Palace of
the Fātimid Caliph El-Mu'izz, begun in 970, is
stated to have had walls constructed of stones ‘so
well joined that one would think they were made in
a single block,’
1 and the three city
gates, the Bāb-el-Futūh,
Bāb-en-Nasr, and Bāb-Zuweyla (1087-91) are
splendid examples of stone masonry; but all the
mosques up to
the XIIth c. are built of brick.
2 The
first stone mosque
is that called El-Akmar,
3 in the
Sūk-en-Nahhāsīn,
built in 1125 by the Fātimid
Caliph El-Amir; and here only the
façade is of stone,
1 Nāsir-i-Khusrau (A.D. 1040), Sefer Nameh, transl. Ch.
Schefer, p. 129.
2 The stone base of the dome in the
court of Ibn-Tūlūn's
mosque dates only from the
restoration by Lāgīn in 1296,
as its inscription states.
So do, in all probability, the
minaret and the adjacent
cloister, which are also of stone.
3 See the 6th Annual Report of the
Commission for the
Preservation of the Monuments of Arab
Art, 67th rapport,
where I have given a plan of the mosque
El-Akmar.

the arches
inside are of brick resting on marble
columns. But the
stone-work is admirably executed,
the shaping accurate, the
joining exact, and the
sculpture of ornament and inscription
very skilful.
Evidently this was not a first attempt, though
it is
the earliest known to us. It leads the way for a
series of similar buildings with stone façades and
brick interiors, which prevailed till nearly the end
of the XIIIth c., when brick was generally abandoned
in favour of stone, laid with wide joints, and
roughened to receive the mortar.
Before 1330 bricks were almost exclusively used
for
minarets. The sumptuous monument of Kalāūn,
which combined
mosque, tomb, and hospital, furnishes
the first example of a
stone tower.
1 Thenceforward
stone minarets
increased until they became almost
universal under the
Circassian Mamlūks, when stone
was everywhere the favourite
material for all parts
of buildings, and it becomes evident
that the architect
has mastered the most difficult problems of
construction.
This development of constructive skill
came to its perfection in time to assist the decorative
spirit of the Circassian period, and exquisite
arabesques admirably executed in stone are lavished
upon the monuments. At the same time the dome,
which had hitherto been coated with stucco, a frail
material for ornament, is also constructed of stone,
1 El-Makrīzy says that the minaret
of Akbughā (1331)
was the first to be built in stone, after that of Kalāūn.—Khitat,
ii., p. 384.

and becomes a
subject for elaborate decoration.
The earliest stone domes,
those of the tomb-mosque
(1405-1410) of Barkūk, the first
Circassian Mamlūk,
in the Eastern Cemetery, are ornamented
with zigzags.
Immediately afterwards other domes are
covered with graceful arabesques, which make one
forget the hard material out of which they airily
spring.
Presently, different coloured stones began to be
chosen to aid in decoration, and by such variegation
a sort of
large mosaic was formed over a considerable
part of the
edifice, and eventually, not the gateways
only, but the entire
façade was treated in this
fashion.
1 The first
mosque, we believe, in which
strata of different coloured
stone were employed, was
that of Ez-Zāhir Beybars, where the
gateways are of
stone of two alternating colours.
1 The vile practice of distempering
the walls and façades
of mosques in red and white stripes
is a coarse attempt to
revive the effect of varied stone
courses. Every effort is
being made by the Commission to
suppress this crude
imitation.
Stone was not used merely in construction, but
also
for tombs, pulpits (minbar), tribunes (dikka),
etc., of which no
more exquisite example can be
cited than the minbar of white gritstone with which
Kāït-Bey endowed the tomb-mosque of Barkūk; it
is a perfect
gem of Arab ornament.
Egypt possesses a considerable variety of stones
suitable for building,
2 but the Arabs, instead of
2 See the collection in the School
of Medicine at Cairo.

going to the
trouble of extracting their own materials
from the quarries,
preferred to rob the buildings of
their predecessors; one
often sees hieroglyphics on
an outer wall of a mosque, whilst
columns, capitals,
lintels, etc., from demolished Graeco-Roman
buildings,
abound. The stone used in the best Arab
period is a white limestone, of a close substance,
which takes a greyish tone with age; or else a
yellowish nummulite stone, too porous for the finest
sculpture. The latter has been almost exclusively
employed during the Turkish period.
Marble was used at all periods by
the Arabs, but
especially in the early days of their
occupation of
Egypt for tombstones (
shāhid), many of which, engraved
(sometimes in relief) with pious formulas, the
name of the
deceased, and the date of death, in kufic
characters, have
been found in the sandy tract about
'Ayn es-Sīra to the south
of
Cairo. They date chiefly
from the IXth c., but some go back earlier. A great
many ancient tombstones have also been brought
from the old Mohammadan cemetery near
Aswān.
Egypt is poor in marble, and
the backs of these
headstones often show that they were taken
from
older Greek, Roman, or Coptic monuments. Such
spoliation was very common: we find a Roman eagle
on a capital in the Citadel mosque of En-Nāsir, a
cross and crown on another in the mosque of El-Muayyad,
and Byzantine columns on either side of
the
niche (
mihrāb) of the mosque of
Ibn-Tūlūn—though
this prince put himself to great pains
to
procure original materials and generally eschewed

spoliation on
principle. Others were less scrupulous,
and cargoes of marble
were brought from ruined
cities of
Syria, whilst the gothic gateway of the
medresa of En-Nāsir, in the Sūk-en-Nahhāsīn, was
ravished
from Acre in 1291 by Khalīl. This habit
of spoliation was
injurious to the growth of Arab
style, especially as to
columns, which were generally
borrowed; and, except the
vase-shaped capitals
(called
kulla, after the earthen water-bottles of the
same
name), no true Arab capital appears till the
characteristic
stalactite form was introduced at a
late date.
1 Marble was not generally employed till
the XIIIth c.,
when it began to be used for veneering,
especially on portals.
When sculptured the work is
naturally finer than on coarser
stone; but the most
beautiful decorative effects in marble are
seen in
mural mosaics and tesselated pavements. The
mosaics were either formed
of pieces of coloured marbles set
in a mortar bed, or various
small pieces were inlaid
in the solid slab which formed the
groundwork.
When the outlines of the space to be inlaid
were too
complicated to be filled without needless labour
in
cutting the marble, the designs were filled in with
a resinous composition, generally red or black.
Many magnificent examples of mosaic may be seen
in the mosques.
1 The
earliest occur in the Medresa of Barkūk, 1384.
The Museum possesses a fine series of richly
sculptured marble vessels (nos. 34, 35, 110, etc.).

Room I.
- 1. Marble slab inscribed ‘In the name of God the
Compassionate, the Merciful.’ L 0.531
1 The dimensions are given in
mètres and centimètres.
D = diameter, H = height, L =
length, W = width. The
mosques, streets, etc.,
mentioned are in Cairo, unless otherwise
stated. Dates
are A.D. unless stated to be A.H. The
colour of marble
is white unless otherwise described.
- 2. Marble slab, inscribed with name of God in
relief. L 0.16 - 3. Grey marble fragment, with Kalima ‘There is
no deity but God’
in relief. H 0.34 - 4. Portion of marble slab, inscribed and originally
painted. (From a tomb.) H 0.18 - 5, 6. Fragments of white marble tombstones with
kufic inscriptions. (From cemetery of Imām
Esh-Shāfi'y.) H 0.58, 0.52 - 7, 8. Limestone inscribed with kufic characters.
(Mosque of El-Hākim, circ. A.D. 1000.) w 0.35 - 9. Marble slab. L 0.35
- 10. Marble medallion commemorating foundation of
a mosque in 817 A.H. (1414). D 0.26 - 11. Marble slab, inscribed with name of Ahmad es-Sabt
and date 1181 A.H. (A.D. 1767. Mosque
of Sinān Pasha at Būlāk). L 0.63 - 12. Marble fragment of tombstone with kufic inscription.
(Cemetery of Esh-Shāfi'y.) H 0.38 - 13. Marble slab with inscription and ornaments in
relief. L 0.32 - 14. Fragment of marble tombstone inscribed with
kufic characters. (Cem. of Esh-Shāfi'y.) L 0.27 - 15. Marble fragment with naskhy inscription. L 0.22
- 16. Marble slab of a fountain (selsebīl)2 sculptured. H 1.35
2 Such slabs were set in
the public street-fountains to
cool the water which
flowed over them.

- 17. Part of a sculptured and painted marble slab.
L 0.28 - 18. Sculptured marble slab, with traces of colour.
(Mosque of El-Māridāny, 1338.) L 0.69 - 19. Sculptured slab from a prayer-niche (mihrāb),
representing a hanging
lamp (inscribed 'God
is the Light of the Heavens and the
Earth'1)
between two candles, on an
arabesque ground.
(Medresa El-Budeyrīya, in the Sālihīya
quarter,
(1357.) H 0.61 1 Korān xxiv, 36. See below, p. 37.
- 20. Fragment of grey marble border; the sunk
ornaments were formerly filled with resinous
paste. L 0.70 - 21. Fragment of marble border. L 0.70
- 22. Angle of framing in sculptured greyish marble.
L 0.16 - 23. Two marble octagonal shafts of columns from a
mihrāb, sculptured on alternate faces
with geometrical
and foliate designs. (x c.) H 1.82, 2.00 - 24. Two conglomerate shafts of mihrāb columns, cut
in facets.
(Mosque of Haydar Shawīsh at
Mansūra.) H 2.00 - 25, 26. Marble border, with symmetrical designs,
incrusted with red and black resinous paste.
(Fountain of Kāït-Bey in the Salība quarter,
end of xv c.) L 0.65, 0.34 - 27, 28. Fragments of marble incrusted with red and
black stone. L 0.30, 0.24 - 29, 30. Fragments of marble sculptured with ornaments
originally coated with stucco. L 0.22 - 31. Marble slab of a street fountain, with arabesque
ornament and border of finely sculptured animals.
(Street-fountain, sebīl, of Farag in front
of the Bāb-Zuweyla:
beginning of xv c.) H 1.81

I. 19. Slab From A
Prayer-Niche. XIVTH CENTURY
- 32. Marble stand for jar, sculptured with ornaments,
nearly effaced. (Mosque of Kāït-Bey,
1472). L 0.55 - 33. Marble stand for jar, made out of the base of a
column, resting on four feet, and covered with
kufic inscriptions and ornaments. (Mosque of
‘Saghry Wardy’ (Taghry Berdy) in the Salība,
1440.) L 0.35

I. 34. Marble Jar
Placed On 108. Marble Stand
- 34. Two-handled marble jar covered with arabesques,
kufic inscription on neck, fish on base.
(Medresa of El-Higāzīya, daughter of En-Nāsir.
xiv
c.)1 H(inside) 0.70 1 According to Prisse d'Avenues, these jars were reserved
in
the mosques for the religious ablutions of
special personages.

- 35. Two-handled marble jar, ribbed. (Mosque of
Umm-el-Ghulām, 1254.) H(inside) 0.70 - 36. Fragment of marble border, with gilt ornament.
L 0.68 - 37. Slab of grey marble covered with arabesques.
H 1.34 - 38. Mouth of a well formed of a marble Byzantine
capital. (Mosque of Zeyn-ed-dīn, in the
Darb-el-Gemāmīz.)
H 0.30 - 39. Tombstone (shāhid)
inscribed with name of
Nabīl Bey and date 1235 A.H.
(1819). H 0.98 - 40. Two serpentine columns of a mihrāb, with ribbed
shafts, and a
cross cut on the capital. (Mosque
of Kūsūn es-Sāky, now
almost destroyed, 1329.) - 41. Marble tombstone with kufic inscription stating
that it was erected by order of El-Hāfiz-li-dīnillāh
(the Fātimid caliph, 1130-1149). H 0.82 - 42. Marble slab inscribed with name El-Kawāmy
El-Husāmy. (Hōsh el-Wāly, in cem. of Esh-Shāfi'y.)
L 0.73 - 43. Limestone front of a tomb, with ornaments, and
date 809 A.H. (1406). L 0.90 - 44. Tombstone of reddish sandstone inscribed with
kufic characters. (x c.) H 0.44 - 45. Corner of limestone coving, sculptured with
foliage surrounding a spread eagle. (Possibly
of the Fātimid epoch. Found in the quarter
of the Bāb-esh-Sha'rīya.) L 0.95 - 46. Fragment of marble with naskhy inscription.
L 0.43

- 47—50. Serpentine tombstones with kufic inscriptions,
dated 465, 459, 589, 429 A.H. (A.D. 1037-1193.
From Kōs, in Upper Egypt.) H 0.47,
0.60, 0.60, 0.70 - 51—53. Diorite tombstones, inscribed, and dated 443
(1051), 590 (1194), 567 (1171); no.52 in naskhy,
the others in kufic. H 0.90, 0.72, 0.85 - 54. Mural mosaic of red and black stone,
mother-of-pearl,
and turquoise enamel. (Mosque of
Kūsūn,
1329.) - 55, 56. Marble Byzantine capitals, one sculptured
with cross. (Mosque of Kūsūn, 1329.) H 0.34, 0.31 - 57. Marble slab sculptured with arabesques. L 0.51
- 58, 59. Marble fragments from a tomb. Modern.
- 60, 61. Marble Byzantine capital. (Mosque of Kūsūn,
1329.) H 0.40 - 62. Marble tombstone inscribed in kufic with name
of Hasan ibn Hoseyn and date 462 A.H. (1069).
H 0.64 - 63. Marble base of a column, sculptured. (Mosque
of Murād Pasha.) H 0.40 - 64. Marble tombstone with kufic inscription dated
262 A.H. (875). H 0.68 - 65, 66. Two Corinthian capitals (one side plain) in
reddish stone, with traces of gilding. (Mosque
of Kūsūn, 1329.) H 0.38 - 67, 68. Red and green porphyry, from a dado. L
0.34, 0.31 - 69. Black stone inlaid with characters in white
marble. L 0.36 - 70. Fragment of marble tombstone, with kufic
inscription,
dated at the end of iii c. A.H. L 0.38 - 71, 72. Slabs of marble engraved with armorial
bearings, a spread eagle, and a goblet. (Bath
of Aïsha el-Hammāmīya in the Darb-el-Gemāmīz,
now demolished.) L 0.46

- 73—75. Keystones in black and red stone and white
marble. L 0.10 - 76. Marble vase, open-work. H 0.23
- 77, 78. Fragments of inscribed marble. L 0.13,
0.25 - 79. White stone, shaped to resemble three plates
joined together. (From débris in mosque of
Ibn-Tūlūn, 876-8.) L 0.30 - 80. Fragment of marble slab with kufic inscription
commemorating the foundation of the mosque
of Ibn-Tūlūn in 876 A.D.1 L 0.27 1 Another similar piece is now
fixed in the līwān or
sanctuary of the mosque, where it was found during
repairs
five years ago.
- 81. Marble slab with kufic inscription. L 0.20
- 82. Sculptured marble. (Mosque of El-Māridāny,
1338.) L 0.12 - 83—87. Five stucco fragments carved with kufic
letters. (Framing of window in ruined medresa
of El-Kāmil, 1224.) - 88. Marble fragment with kufic inscription, xvi c.
L 0.27 - 89. Piece of mural mosaic in white marble and
black, red, and yellow stone. H 0.29 - 90. Portion of marble slab with kufic inscription.
(Cemetery of 'Amr at Masr el-'Atīka.) L 0.29 - 91. Fragment of veined marble. L 0.19
- 92. Fragment of sculptured marble. L 0.18
- 93. Cast bronze octagonal lantern (tannūr) for
110 lamps, in
open-work, chased with ornaments
and inscriptions, giving
name of Sultān Hasan.
(Mosque of Sultān Hasan, 1358.) H
2.00 - 94. Three coloured glass and stucco window-lights
(kamarīya). Modern. H 0.92

- 95. Part of marble frieze sculptured with ornaments.
xviii c. L 0.22 - 96. Three coloured glass window-lights. (Demolished
cupola near the tomb of the Imām Esh-Shāfi'y.)
L 0.32 - 97. Limestone bas-relief, a lion clutching a gazelle.
(Modern.) L 0.75 - 98. Marble stand for jar, with four feet, sculptured
with ornaments, mythical animals, and kufic
inscription. H 0.47 - 99. Inscribed marble slab. (Given by M. Pugioli.)
L 0.45 - 100. Marble tombstone with kufic inscription in
relief. H 0.67 - 101. Dark syenite tombstone with naskhy inscription,
in form of a mihrāb,
giving name of Sheykh
Abu-l-Hoseyn 'Aly ibn Absa, and date
of death
637 A.H. (1239), with name of sculptor—‘Made
by Mohammad ibn el-Hāgg Ahmad.’ H 0.59 - 102. Curved piece of limestone, carved with floral
ornament, on a gilt ground. H 0.34 - 103. Serpentine tombstone of Ya'kūb ibn Ibrāhīm
el-Marāzy. L 0.22 - 104. Marble fragment with kufic inscriptions on
both sides. (Given by Dr. Schweinfurth.) L
0.68 - 105. Limestone vase with four heads of geese.
(Modern; given by Dr. Schweinfurth.) D 0.15 - 106. Plate in limestone. (Modern; given by Dr.
Schweinfurth.) D 0.15 - 107. Marble stand (kelga), sculptured with ornaments
and kufic
inscription. (Mosque of
Makla-Bey Tāz.) H 0.44 - 108. Marble stand ornamented with mythical animals
with human faces, etc. (Mosque of Zeyned-dīn,
in the Darb-el-Gemāmīz.) H 0.43

- 109. Marble stand, on four feet, with kufic inser. in
relief (nearly obliterated), and engaged pilasters
at the sides. H 0.42 - 110. Marble jar. (Mosque of Saghry Wardy.) H 0.60
- 111. Marble jar, with grey veins. (Zāwiya of
Seyf-el-Yazal.)
H 0.60 - 112. Marble centre of fountain, with kufic inscriptions
on sides. D 0.49 - 113, 114. Angle of a tomb, engraved with ornaments
and kufic and naskhy inscriptions richly sculptured.
H 0.92 - 115, 116. Marble shafts of columns. (Niche of
sebīl of Kāït-Bey, near El-Azhar. End
of
xv c.) H 1.69, 0.69 - 117, 118. Bases of preceding. H 0.19
- 119. Limestone sundial. L 0.59
- 120. Marble sundial, dated 1163 A.H. (1749). L 0.95
- 121. Marble slab engraved with kufic inser. on one
side, and naskhy on the other. w 0.50 - 122. Coloured glass and stucco window. (Modern.)
H 0.89 - 123. Marble Corinthian capital. H 0.39
- 124. Marble slab engraved with naskhy inscriptions.
(Medresa of Barkūk, in the Sūk-en-Nahhāsīn.)
L 0.30 - 125. Grey marble jar. H 0.66
- 126. Marble jar with three handles. H 0.66
- 127, 128. Two marble jars, inscribed ‘Our lord the
Sultān el-Melik el-Ashraf Abū-n-Nasr Kāït-Bey
(exalted be his glory) bestowed this jar
(zīr) for this blessed fountain on
account of
Mohammad and his family.’ (End of xv c.)
H 0.53, 0.61 - 129. Marble angle of a tomb with inscriptions and
ornaments in relief. (Mosque of El-Chirkesy,
in the Beyn-es-Siyārig.) H 0.86
- 130. Marble stand for jar, with two heads in relief
on either side. H 0.43 - 131. Marble stand for jar, with kufic inscriptions
and heads. H 0.42 - 132. Marble stand for jar, corners rounded. H 0.40
- 133. Marble stand for jar, in two pieces. H 0.41
[Back to top]
ROOM II.
Metal-Work
1
1 A fuller sketch of the history of
this branch of art may
be read in the French edition of this
Catalogue.

In no department of Arab art
is the influence of the
style which the Persian Sasanians
inherited and
developed from Assyrian models more
distinctly
visible than in metal-work, where we find the
Persian
ornamentation by means of human and animal
figures prevailing in spite of the objections of strict
Muslims. The traveller Nāsir-i-Khusrau, who visited
many Mohammadan countries in 1035-1042, besides
noticing the gold and silver work at Tyre and Jerusalem,
dwells especially on the triumphs of the goldsmith's
art which he saw in
Egypt in 1040. In the
palace of the Fātimid caliphs at
Cairo he saw the
throne of El-Mustansir, which was made of
pure gold
and silver, chased with beautiful inscriptions and
hunting
scenes; and the inventory of the same caliph's
possessions recorded by the historian El-Makrīzy
describes an extraordinary collection of magnificent
objects in the precious metals and stones. All these
have disappeared, however, and it is only from the

close of the
XIIIth c., that we are able to study
Egyptian metal-work from
objects still in existence;
but thenceforward its development
may be continuously
observed up to the beginning of the XVIth
c.
The connection with Mesopotamia is easily traced.
Many objects bear the name of the artist and of the
city of Mōsul,
1 and we see the
characteristic style of
Mesopotamian ornament in the human
figures, hunting
scenes, etc., chased in silver, inlaid on
bronze.
The contemporaneous metal-work of Egypt itself
reveals the same technical method of inlay and
chasing, but the ornament is modified in accordance
with the prevailing ideas of all Saracenic decoration
in that country. There is more floral and geometrical
ornament, of the same style that we see in woodcarvings
and stone and stucco work of the period,
and less of the representation of figures and animals
which is
typical of Mōsul.
1 See S. Lane-Poole,
The Art of the Saracens in Egypt,
pp. 151 ff.
Amongst the choicest examples in the Museum is
the
kursy or table (no. 13) of the Mamlūk
Sultān
En-Nāsir Mohammad, on which we see indeed
representations
of ducks (in allusion, no doubt, to the
name of En-Nāsir's father Kalāūn, which means
‘duck’ in old Turkish),
2 but these figures are quite
subordinate to the floral and geometrical decoration.
This table is unquestionably a product of the Saracenic
art of Egypt, and El-Makrīzy tells us
3 that

there was a
‘Market of Inlayers’ (Sūk-el-Keftīyīn)
at
Cairo, and that richly chased objects, such as a
dikka or settle, inlaid with silver and
gold, after the
manner of our table, formed a prominent
feature in
wedding gifts. One of them belonging to
Sitt-el-'Amāïm
(‘Lady of the Turbans’), a merchant's
daughter, was so richly decorated that her betrothed
gave her 100,000
dirhems
(francs) merely to
repair
it. This passion for costly inlay had already
vanished in
El-Makrīzy's day (he died in 1441), and
only a small number of
inlayers then plied their
trade.
1 The value which the
owners placed upon
such possessions may be inferred from the
fact that
they often had their names engraved upon them,
and
one sometimes finds a series of successive
proprietors'
names on a single dish or bowl.
1 S. Lane-Poole, op. cit., pp. 165-167.
The metals employed were copper and its various
alloys, which can only be distinguished by chemical
tests. The
objects include large caldrons, coffers,
tables, bowls,
censers, candelabra, lamps, bosses and
plating on doors, etc.
The last are most readily
dated and ascribed to
Cairo workers, and some
which have been found in the mosques are now in
the Museum.
The oldest are the folding doors
(Annex I, no. 9) from the
mosque of Es-Sālih
Talāi' b. Ruzzīk, built A.H. 555 (1160),
which are
covered with starlike polygonal designs in cast
bronze on a thin surface of brass.
2 Here the
castings
2 The mosque, which still stands
opposite the Bāb-Zuweyla,
though in a ruined state, was
restored after the
earthquake of 1302 by Seyf-ed-dīn
Bektemir; but the
doors are of the Fātimid style, and must
have belonged to
the original building.

are plain;
but others are engraved with very
graceful designs, as on the
doors which came from
the medresa of Tatār el-Higāzīya,
granddaughter of
Kalāūn, founded in 761 A.H. (1359). To about
the
same time (1362) belongs the door of the tomb of
Sultān Hasan, with its delicate inlay of gold and silver.
The two leaves of the medresa of Barkūk, with
bronze foliage coated with silver, and those of El-Ghūry,
show that the art was still pursued with
undiminished skill
under the Circassian Mamlūks.
The various lamps and lanterns
or chandeliers in
the Museum, of the XIVth c. and XVth c., are
constructed
in tiers to carry numerous little oil
lamps,
which were prevented from dripping upon the
worshippers by a tray (like no. 107 in Room II)
hung beneath, which also concealed the unattractive
interior. The tray in question is partly in
repoussé work, chased with decoration
of the latest Mamlūk
style; for it comes from the mosque of
El-Ghūry,
founded in 1503. The gratings, especially
those
which closed the windows of
sebīls (street drinking-fountains),
were also subjects for decoration, and
their knobs were often
engraved with the name of”
Allah or the arms of the founder;
for heraldic
devices were much in vogue in the XVth c.
Nothing
in the way of metal-work, however, surpasses
for
taste or skill the
kursis already mentioned, or the
little book-box
(no. 57), with its delicate designs

and
enchanting kufic border, which still show traces
of the gold
inlay which was reserved for the finest
class of work. After
the XVIth c., bronze fell out
of vogue; it was no longer used
for the doors of
mosques or other public buildings, and
although
gratings were still made of it, they were no
longer
skilfully fitted together, but were cast in a
single
piece. About the second half of the XVIIIth c.,
western influences begin to intrude in the designs.
Besides bronze, the Arab smith worked in iron.
Nāsir-i-Khusrau mentions the iron-plated doors of the
Haram at
Jerusalem, and also the massive iron doors
of El-Mahdīya in
Tunis. In Egypt, iron was not in
great demand for artistic purposes, but one may cite
the forged iron gratings in certain mosques, especially
in that of En-Nāsir in the Citadel, which attracted
the attention of El-Makrīzy. Iron nails arranged in
effective patterns were sometimes used to decorate
the doors of mosques (see nos. 10, 50, in Passage)
and some of the old gates of the city quarters, which
were formerly closed at night.
Unfortunately, the Museum possesses no specimens
of
Saracenic arms or armour. There was once
an Armourers' Market
in the Beyn-el-Kasreyn,
opposite where Kalāūn's tomb now
stands. The
present Armourers' Market (Sūk-es-Silāh) is
near
the mosque of Sultan Hasan, but it has not
inherited
the reputation of its predecessor.

II. 12. Inlaid Silver
And Brass Kursy. XIVTH CENTURY

Room II.
- 1. Brass. candlestick of mosque, engraved with
inscriptions. (From the Citadel.) H 0.37 - 2. Brass candlestick, with traces of silver inlay,
engraved with inscription in the name of the
Mamlūk Sultān Husām-ed-dīn Lāgīn, who presented
it to the mosque of Ibn-Tūlūn, when he
restored it in 1296. H 0.41 - 3. Part of a copper vessel engraved with ornaments
and inscriptions in name of a certain mamlūk
of En-Nāsir. xiv c.? H 0.18 - 4. Covered vessel (lamp?) in copper, with repoussé
ornament, and inscription in name of Sultān
Hasan. (From his mosque, 1358.) H, with
cover, 0.44 - 5. Base of a crescent, hilāl (formerly surmounting a
dome), engraved with
ornaments and inscriptions
in praise of a Sultān. H 0.30 - 6. Upper part of a vase, edged with ornaments
and inscriptions. (Medresa of Barkūk, 1384.)
H 0.19 - 7. Part of a copper vessel engraved with ornaments
and inscriptions bearing Mamlūk name. xiv c.
H 0.33 - 8. Fragment of a copper vessel with ornaments and
inscriptions. (Medresa of Barkūk.) H 0.14 - 9. Copper goblet-shaped vessel with ornaments and
inscriptions. H 0.40 - 10. Cup (tās) engraved
with verses. H 0.37
- 11. Brass vessel engraved with inscriptions. H 0.33
- 12. Brass Kursy (table)
of open-work, richly chased
and inlaid with silver.
(Medresa of En-Nāsir,
1299.) H 0.70 - 13. Brass kursy: the
sides are divided into panels
by borders of naskhy
inscriptions in silver inlay
in honour of Sultān En-Nāsir
Mohammad;
the panels are of filigree work, chased
with
arabesques and inscriptions partly inlaid with
silver; in the centre of the top is a rosette
formed by a kufic inscription, and in various
places are representations of ducks in silver
inlay; one of the panels forms a folding door
through which a pan of live charcoal was
doubtless introduced to keep the tray of food
warm.1 xiv c. (Māristān of Kalāūn.) H 0.82 1 See S. Lane-Poole, Art of the Saracens, p. 189.

- 14. Two fragments of brass plates, engraved with
inscriptions (traces of silver inlay), with, on
three sides, a frame of chased filigree work in
copper, cast. (Tomb-mosque of Barkūk, 1405—
1410.) L 0.39, 0.41 - 15, 15A. Two pieces of cast-brass bordering from a
door, fleur-de-lis filigree work. L 0.24, 0.31 - 16. Brass tray of mosque lantern, in repoussé work,
chased with animals and inscriptions. (Mosque
of Sultān Hasan, 1358.) D 0.75 - 17—20. Four brass plates engraved with ornaments.
(Door of tomb-mosque of El-Ghūry, 1503.) L
0.34, 0.27, 0.27, 0.34 - 21. Angle of brass panel with engraved and repoussé
ornament. L 0.24 - 22. Brass plate engraved with decorative interlaced
kufic inscription on arabesque ground. L 1.04 - 23. Fragment of brass plate with inscriptions giving
name of En-Nāsir Mohammad. xiv c. L 0.21 - 24, 25. Two brass door-plates, engraved with ornaments
and inscriptions in honour of a Sultān.
xv c.? L 1.31 - 26—31. Six brass door-plates engraved with ornaments
and inscriptions, commemorating the
foundation of the mosque of Ezbek el-Yūsufy
Ras-nawbat-en-nawāb (commander of the royal
guard), A.H.
900 (1495), still standing in the
quarter of the
Birket-el-Fīl. L 0.85, 0.86, 0.69,
0.84, 0.39, 0.70

II. 13. Inlaid Silver
And Brass Kursy Of En-Nāsir
Mohammad. XIVTH CENTURY

II. 57. Korān Case
Plated With Brass Inlaid With Silver And Gold.

- 32–48. Seventeen chased brass door-plates. (From
the xv c. mosque, at right of the Musky, but
now demolished, of Ezbek ibn Tutush [not to
be confounded with Ezbek el-Yūsufy above
mentioned], who was Atābeg el-Asākir or commander-in-chief,
and gave his name to the
Ezbekīya
quarter.) L 0.65, 0.61, 1.35, 0.70, 0.54,
1.28, 1.16,
1.30, 1.02, 1.00, 0.64, 0.58, 0.58, 0.64, 0.15,
0.46,
0.46. (No. 45 retains some of its nail-heads.) - 49, 50. Two brass squares in chased filigree work,
from a door. L 0.13 - 51–53. Three pieces of squares like preceding. L
0.13, 0.44, 0.44 - 54, 55. Two cast-brass knockers engraved with ornaments.
L 0.34 - 56. Iron lance found in the mosque of El-Ghūry.
L 0.70 - 57. Korān-case of wood, plated with brass, richly
chased and inlaid with silver and traces of gold
on a ground of black paste; the inscriptions
give neither name nor date. (Tomb-mosque of
El-Ghūry, 1503.) L 0.44, H 0.28 - 58. Wooden lock (dabba)
plated with chased and
repoussé silver. (Tomb of Seyyid
'Abd-el-āl,
at Tanta.) L 0.21 - 59. Wooden lock, similar to preceding. (From
Mansūra.) L 0.17 - 60. Wooden lock, plated with silver, with repoussé
ornaments and inscriptions. (Mosque of Seyyida
Zeyneb.) L 0.26 - 61, 62. Two silver gilt balls engraved with name of
'Othmānly Sultān Mustafā ibn Mohammad and
dated 1032 A.H. (1623). (Tomb of Seyyid El-Bedawy
at
Tanta.) D 0.24

- 63, 64. Brass ewers coated with mother-of-pearl.
H 0.18 - 65. Three silver anklets (khulkhāl). (From a tomb
in Upper Egypt.) - 66. Twenty-four iron arrows, found in the wooden
roofing of the Ghūrīya street. (When this
roofing was removed in 1882 the beams and
planks were
found to be riddled with arrows.) - 67. Coins (four gold) found during the demolition
of houses in the Ghūrīya. - 68. Lower part of a brass crescent engraved with
Mamlūk inscriptions and ornaments. H 0.20 - 69. Upper part of a copper vessel engraved with
Mamlūk inscriptions, ornaments, and medallions
containing heraldic arms, a lozenge. H 0.20 - 70. Turban-support from a tomb, copper. (Tomb of
Seyyid El-Bedawy at Tanta.) H 0.22 - 71. Copper plate with repoussé inscriptions bearing
name of Sultān Lāgīn. (From a door near the
mihrāb of the Mosque of Ibn-Tūlūn,
restored by
Lāgīn in 1296.) L 1.40 - 72. Copper coins found in a demolished house in
the Ghūrīya. - 73. Two cast and turned brass candlesticks. H 0.44
- 74. Two turned wooden candlesticks with plates of
tin: rude work. H 0.35 - 75, 76. Cast-brass candlestick. H 0.21, 0.38
- 77. Cast-brass candlestick with perforated tray.
H 0.55 - 78. Part of cast-brass lamp. D 0.20
- 79. Cast-brass candlestick with perforated tray.
H 0.41 - 80. Upper part of a four-branched brass candlestick.
H 0.25

- 81. Brass suspenders for oil-lamps (four of the lower
eight missing). - 82. Tin suspender for 20 branches of oil-lamps.
- 83, 84. Copper tray with four candlesticks. D 0.34
- 85. Brass tray with three candlesticks. L 0.26
- 86. Twenty-one cast and perforated brass trays (and
two pieces) for suspension of oil-lamps, in two
patterns. D 0.46 - 87. Three turned cast-brass students' lamps. H 0.72–0.78
- 88. Brass filigree lamps. (Mosque of Seyyid El-Bedawy
at Tanta.) D 0.22 - 89. Five cast-brass cups from a street fountain.
H 0.11 - 90. Six cast-brass cups with inscriptions in name of
the 'Othmānly Sultān Mahmūd I and dated
1164 A.H. (1750). (Sebīl of Sultān Mustafā III,
built in
1760, opposite the mosque of Seyyida
Zeyneb.) H 0.13 - 91. Two knockers of cast-brass filigree work.
L 0.23 - 92. Brass knocker, richly chased. D 0.23
- 93. Brass anvil of knocker. H 0.11
- 94. Brass knocker, perforated and chased with
ornaments, with traces of armorial bearings in
central disc. L 0.25 - 95, 96. Lattice-work of brass wire from a window.
D 0.72 - 97. Shield with iron centre-plate. (Mosque of El-Ghūry,
1503.) D 0.47 - 98. Fifteen brass chains for suspending lamps.
- 99–101. Upper parts of copper crescents. H 1.63,
0.65, 0.80 - 102, 103. Copper crescent (traces of gilding on 103).
H 0.71, 0.80 - 104, 105. Parts of copper crescents. H 0.53, 0.36

- 106. Brass crescent with plates engraved with
inscriptions
on both sides. (Mosque of Sultān
Hasan, 1358.) H 0.34 - 107. Brass lantern of 160 lights with four turrets,
and tray below, in open and repoussé work,
engraved with ornaments and inscriptions.
(Medresa of El-Ghūry, 1503.) H 2.60 - 108. Brass lantern, for seven lights; upper part
dome - shaped, engraved with inscriptions.
(Mosque of Seyyida Zeynab, 1760.) D 0.38 - 109. Brass lantern, like preceding, but dome of
open work. (Mosque of Seyyid El-Bedawy at
Tanta.) D 0.32 - 110. Brass lantern, shaped like hexagonal cone, for
seven lights, and nine branches, engraved with
ornaments, and inscriptions in the name of
Kigmās Amīr-Akhūr (Master of the Horse, to
Kāït-Bey), whose arms appear on a medallion
in the centre of each side: on a fess, a cup
inscribed with hieroglyphic characters, supported
on either side by a cornucopiae; in
chief, a lozenge; in base, a small cup. (Probably
from
mosque of Kigmās, built 886 A.H.,
1481, at the entrance of
the Darb-el-Ahmar,
and now in process of restoration.) H
1.10 - 111. Copper tray of lantern, with medallions containing
inscription in honour of a Sultān. - 112. Eight pieces of perforated and chased cast-bronze.
(Doors of Medresa of Barkūk, 1384.)
L
0.24–0.60 - 113. Copper vessel (lamp?) with three handles.
H 0.41 - 114. Two pieces of copper plating of a casket, chased
with ornaments and inscriptions and inlaid
with gold and silver. (Medresa of Barkūk.)
L 0.33
- 115. Tongue of iron lock. (Medresa of Barkūk.)
L 0.85 - 116. Ten stucco and coloured glass window-lights.
(Modern.) H 0.52–1.55 - 117. Brass tray of lantern engraved with inscriptions
and ornaments. D 0.78 - 118. Cast-brass candlestick. H 0.63
- 119. Iron tongs. (Mosque of El-Ghūry.) L 0.34
- 120. Copper octagonal lantern with perforated brass
sides, for eight lights. L 0.34
[Back to top]
ROOM IV.
WOODWORK

Egypt is naturally very poor
in wood, but the
trouble and expense of importation have not
deterred
its artists from employing this material largely
and
with remarkable skill in their architecture and
minor arts. The dryness of the climate has contributed
to the successful employment of wood for
building purposes. The pillars of the mosque of
Ibn-Tūlūn,
which have stood for more than a
thousand years, have wooden
ties, and the oldest
brick domes are stiffened by a complete
framework
of wood. The mosque of Ibn-Tūlūn has also a
large
frieze of wood carved with a portion of the Korān
in
kufic letters,
1 and its arcades were
formerly covered
by a wooden ceiling, a small portion of
which
the Commission for the Preservation of the
Monuments
was able to retain during the recent repair
of the mosque, and of which the joists were then
visible. These joists consisted of a trunk of a palm
tree sawn in two, and faced on the three exposed
1 Not, as has been supposed, the
whole Korān. Corbet
Bey, in his Life and Works of Ibn-Tūlūn, says the frieze
does not contain more than one-seventeenth of the
Korān.
He is wrong, however, in stating that the
letters of the
inscription were “cut out in solid wood and
fixed on to the
board”: they are carved on the board
itself in relief.

sides with
planks. The spaces between the joists
were divided by
cross-beams into shallow compartments.
This kind of ceiling
has been in use, with
modifications and improvements, from the
beginning
of Saracenic architecture, through the finest
periods,
down to our own day. Another method was to
ceil
the joists across with boards; and a third, which
has
the richest effect, consisted of a ceiling of
stalactites.
In all three methods the ceilings were always
painted
and gilt, with ornamentation carved in the wood
or
applied in stucco. This roofing never rested
directly
upon the walls: there was always a transition—
an aesthetic necessity—formed by arching, coving,
stalactites, etc., which was treated with the same
splendour of decoration as the ceiling itself, and
presented the utmost possibilities of Arab art in
finished perfection, in form, and in colouring. Such
ceilings, of which some beautiful specimens have
come down to us, were not reserved for religious
buildings, but were also employed for private rooms,
as the few remains of early palaces and houses—such
as the palace of the Amir Beshtāk (XIVth c.) in the
Nahhāsīn, or the house of Gemāl-ed-dīn Ez-Zahaby
(XVIIth c.) in the Ghūrīya quarter—abundantly
prove. But nowhere was the art of wood-carving
and
decoration developed in greater perfection than
in the making
of doors, shutters, pulpits, Korān-lecterns
tables, settles,
stools, etc., which form the
principal objects of the limited
furniture in use in
Arab mosques and houses.
In the treatment of surfaces two leading methods

of decoration
were employed, (1) an intricate panelled
joinery, on (2) open
turned work.
1.
Panelling. In the very
earliest examples we
find a tendency to multiply the number of
frames or
borders, which gradually grew into a complicated
composition of polygonal frames enclosing panels
sometimes as small as a centimètre in superficies.
Apart from their love of geometrical designs, the
Arabs had a good reason for this minute subdivision
of their panels, in the warping effects of a hot
climate on large surfaces. The ornamenting of the
faces of the panels and frames was effected by
carvings, inlay, or paint. In the mosque of Ibn-
Tūlūn we have some of the oldest specimens of Arab
wood-carving, in the ceilings of the door-bays (no.
75 in the Passage: next in date observe the door
no. 1 in the Passage). Here the carving is in the
shape of volutes cut deep in the wood, recalling the
foliate ornament of the Byzantine style; a resemblance
still more obvious in the wood-carvings found
in the tract of 'Ayn es-Sīra, south of
Cairo, which
date from the early centuries of the
Hijra. Apparently
the same style of ornament prevailed up
to
the XIIth c.; but in the XIIIth c., we notice a
deviation
from traditional forms: the panels become
smaller, the lines finer and more complex (see nos.
49 and 50 in Room IV, and no. 55 of Passage).
The last is from the annex of the tomb of Es-Sālih
Ayyūb
(1249); and the tomb-covering itself is the
first example we
possess of a style which was already
well developed. The
little panels are formed into

hexagonal
stars and delicately carved, and here
appears the
representation of fruit-stalks which
are a common feature in
XIIIth c. wood-carving (see
nos. 32, 33, 62, in Room IV). The
mihrāb or prayer
niche
from the chapel of Seyyida Rukeyya (no. 62),
which belongs
probably to the same century, deserves
special notice for its
characteristic ornamentation of
stems branching out of a vase.
Wood-carving
reached its highest development in the XIVth
c.—the
century of greatest splendour in all Arab arts—
especially during the reign of En-Nāsir Mohammad,
and under the influence of that Sultān's family and
the officers of his court. The use of various coloured
woods and inlay, already observed in the tomb of
Es-Sālih Ayyūb, became more frequent, until
eventually almost the whole surface is inlayed. In
the XVth c.
ivory begins to be used for inlaying.
Good effects were also
obtained by carvings on solid
planed planks (see no. 5 in the
Passage).
Under the Turkish domination a rougher mode of
woodwork was employed, but the little panels were
still
retained, though seldom carved, unless perhaps
with a single
inscription. Wood, ivory,
tortoiseshell and mother-of-pearl
inlay is characteristic
of this epoch. In the Delta a special
kind of
woodwork was produced, in which the panel-work
was imitated by grooving.
No. 54 in Room IV and no. 4 in the Passage
should
be noted for their rare representations of
men and animals
2.
Turnery. Meshrebīya ('a place
for drink')

properly
means the little projecting bay, in a turned
lattice window,
in which a porous drinking-vessel
(
kulla) was placed to cool by evaporation; whence
it came to mean the lattice window itself, and
commonly in the present day any sort of turned
lattice-work. Doubtless this kind of turning dates
from very ancient times, and was done with the
same primitive bow-lathe as nowadays, but the
fragility of the work has permitted very few old
examples
to survive, and the earliest to which we
can still point is
the massive lattice railing which
encloses the tomb of Kalāūn
(1284). We do not find
the true delicate meshrebīya work in
this grating
or in the pulpit set up by Lāgīn in 1296 in
the
mosque of Ibn-Tūlūn,
1 though the latter has
a finer
mesh and inlaid knobs. The true meshrebīya is
first found in the mosque of El-Māridāny (1338),
where the
līwān or
sanctuary is separated from the
court by partitions showing,
among other kinds of
turnery, a system of hexagons connected
by little
cylinders. At the beginning of the XVth c. we
have
some fine examples of meshrebīya (e.g. the pulpit
of
El-Muayyad), and the art attained its highest
perfection
and variety of design at the time of
Kāït-Bey
(e.g. the panel with kufic inscription over
the
door of the pulpit of the mosque of Abū-Bekr ibn
Mazhar). Meshrebīyas naturally were used principally
in houses, where they kept out the indiscreet glances
1 Of which there are some panels in
the South Kensington
Museum.

of
passers-by, whilst admitting air and a subdued
light and
giving a sufficient outlook; but they contributed
not a little
to the disastrous conflagrations
which used to be common in
Cairo. European
persiennes and
shīshas have now almost wholly
superseded the meshrebīya lattices of the past,
which with
their corbellings and cornices once
formed a beautiful feature
in the external decoration
of the house. The varied forms and
designs, inlayings
and carvings, of meshrebīyas cannot be
described,
but may be seen in the Museum, as also the
method
of introducing inscriptions (e.g. Room VII, no.
29).
A different system of lattice-work, chiefly used in
the Delta, consists in crossed laths fretted with
geometrical
designs, producing an excellent effect.
Ivory was used for filling panels
of wood frame-work,
when it was generally carved, and for
inlay
work, combined with ebony, tin, redwood, etc., in
a
fine mosaic put together and sawn off in thin veneer
after the manner of Tunbridge work in England. In
this form it was largely employed in the XVth c.,
for borders and even for entire surfaces of furniture
(Room IV., nos. 57–60). Ivory does not often occur
by itself, except in a few rare specimens in the
museums of Europe.
Room IV.
- 1. Piece of wood, carved, with traces of gold and
colour. (Ceiling of mosque of El-Māridāny,
1338.) L 2.50 - 2. Folding door, with turned panels at top and
bottom, and joined panels inlaid with ivory in
the middle. (From a house.) H 2.26

- 3. Shield carved with tughrā (monogram) of Sultān
Mahmūd II of Turkey. Modern. (Mosque in
Darb-el-Asfar.) L 0.66 - 4. Top of a table (kursy) of wood inlaid with
mosaic of ebony, ivory,
and tin. L 0.51 - 5. Box for mosque offerings, wood inlaid with
ivory. L 0.62 - 6. Two ostrich eggs carved with inscriptions and
ornaments. (Mosque of Seyyid El-Bedawy, at
Tanta.) H 0.17 - 7. Two ivory tablets carved with ornaments and
inscriptions commemorating the foundation of
a medresa or collegiate mosque. (Mosque of
Sha'bān, 1368.) L 0.36 - 8. Part of board inlaid with mosaic of ebony, ivory
and tin. L 0.15 - 9. Camel-bone (part) with black inscription.
(Given by M. Philip, 1887.) L 0.20 - 10. Horn. (Mosque of Seyyid El-Bedawy, Tanta.)
L 0.41 - 11. Lock (dabba) of
wood inlaid with mother-of-pearl. 0.41
- 12. Reliquary of painted wood. (Mosque of the
Hasaneyn, c. 1770.) L 0.70 - 13. Tablet of wood, with names of God, the Prophet,
the first caliphs, and verses in gilt stucco. H 0.75 - 14. Six small panels carved with arabesques. L 0.11 – 0.22
- 15. Panel carved with inscription a verse of the
Korān, and date 1175 A.H. (1761). (From the
Delta.) L 0.37 - 16. Panel carved with inscription: ‘Ordered the making of this sacred
pulpit our lord
the Sultān El-Melik ez-Zāhir
Mohammad Abū-Sa'īd Gakmak,
magnified be his
triumph.’ (Mosque of Gakmak, 1453.) L
0.45

- 17. Part of tomb, no. 21, with inscription in the
name of Sheykh ‘Aly El-Bakly, deceased
696 A.H. (1296). L 1.07 - 18. Commemorative tablet with inscription like
no. 16. (Mosque of Gakmak.) L 0.45 - 19. Tablet commemorating the gift of a copy of the
Korān and lectern by Kāït-Bey:
‘This Noble Book
and the lectern, dedicated our lord
the Sultān
El-Melik el-Ashraf Abū-n-Nasr Kāït-Bey,
magnified
be his triumph!’ Latter part of xv c.
L 0.34 - 20. Part of commemorative tablet with inscriptions
dated 874 A.H. = 1469. (Mosque of Gakmak.)
L. 0.41 - 21. Two fragments of a tomb in wood panelling,
delicately carved with inscriptions and ornaments;
another part is no. 17. (Mosque of
Imām
Esh-Shāfi'y, 1211.) L 0.14 - 22. Folding doors of panel-work inlaid with ivory.
(Mosque of Ezbek el-Yūsufy, 1495.) L 1.92 - 23. Folding doors of panel-work inlaid with ebony
and ivory carved with arabesques. (Mosque of
Ibn-el-Bakry, in the Hārat-el-Utūf, c. 1370.)
L 1.71 (top panels wanting). - 24. Tablet commemorating restoration of pulpit,
&c.
of mosque of Kādy Yahyā Zeyn-ed-dīn at
Būlāk (now called Jāmi'-el-Mehkema) by Khawāja
Mustafā in the reign of Kāït-Bey. Late
xv c. L 0.76 - 25. Panel carved with ornaments. L 0.48
- 26. Panel of white wood carved and bordered with
ebony. L 0.36

- 27. Part of lintel of pulpit of mosque of el-Amawy
at Asyūt, with kufic inscription: '… our
lord and master the Imām
El-Mustansir-billah,
commander of the faithful.' xi c.
L 1.00 - 28. Carved panel. L 0.35
- 29. Square carved panel. L 0.09
- 20. Portion of carved framing. L 0.60
- 31. Stalactite angle-piece, made of joined wood. L 1.15
- 32. Prayer-niche (mihrāb) of carved wood flanked
by two pillars.
(Mosque El-Azhar.1) H 1.65 1 This mihrāb and the tablet no. 34 were
both in the
Azhar, and, though not found together, it
seems probable
that they were once united. The use of
the palm-tree for
forming the hollow, the simple
outlines, and restrained
foliate ornament are signs of
early style; and no. 34 bears
the date 1125. See P.
Ravaisse, ‘Sur trois mihrābs en
bois sculpté,’ in Mem. de l' Inst. Egyptien, 1889.
- 33. Prayer-niche (mihrāb) of carved wood in small
panels, with kufic
verse from the Korān.
(Mosque of Sitta Nefīsa, rebuilt c.
1760.)
H 1.92, signs of clumsy repairs. - 34. Tablet carved with kufic inscription commemorating
erection of a mihrād
in El-Azhar in
519 A.H. = 1125, with name of Fātimid
caliph
El-āmir bi-ahkāmi-llāh. (Mosque El-Azhar,
probably belonging to no. 32.) L 1.22 - 35. 36. Carved and perforated panels. L 0.45,
0.49 - 37. Secret door in form of cupboard, with small
panelled door in middle inlaid with ivory, and
compartments all round for vases, &c. H 1.59 - 38. Two panels of wood with plain ivory centres
edged with mosaic. L 0.07 - 39. Four panels of wood with mosaic centres edged
with ivory. L 0.05

- 40. Fourteen panels of wood, some inlaid with
ivory, some carved. L 0.03–0.11 - 41. Two small ivory panels inlaid with ebony, ivory,
and redwood. L 0.04 - 42. Three panels of wood inlaid with ivory and
ebony mosaic. L 0.08 - 43. Part of a door, with panel-work carved or inlaid
with ivory. H 0.84 - 44. Three ivory panels carved with ornaments, and
on the two larger panels this inscription:

‘Fl-Melik en-Nāsir,
Nāsir-ed-dunyā
wa-d-dīn.’ xiv c. L 0.06 - 45. Four small carved panels of ivory. L 0.16
- 46. Six wood panels inlaid with plain ivory centres
bordered with fillets. L 0.07–0.10 - 47. Joists of carved wood with iron rings for suspending
lamps, etc. (Tomb-mosque of El-Ghūry,
1503.) L 3.9 - 48. Korān-case of wood carved and painted with
arabesques
inside and out, with inscription
(inverted
in front): 
‘For the
Noble Powerful Book
… the Sultān, Ruler, El-Melik
el-Ashraf Abū-n-Nasr
Kānsūh El-Ghūry, God perpetuate
his
rule.’ c. 1503. L 0.79, wrongly put together. - 49, 50. Three sides of a wooden tomb-casing, finely
carved with rich and graceful ornaments and
inscription giving name of Husn-ed-dīn Tālib
b. Ya'kūb. 1216.1 - (Tomb of Sa‘dāt
et-Talba,
near the mosque of Imām Esh-Shāfi'y.) L 1.80
1 The fourth side,
containing the date 613 A.H. = 1216, is
in the South
Kensington Museum, and is reproduced on
page 55. See
Lane-Poole, Art of the Saracens, p.
122 and
fig. 44. On the back are carved ornaments of a
much
earlier date, probably done for an older tomb
of 304 A.H. = 916.


IV. 59. Kursy Of
Inlaid Ivory And Ebony
- 51. Two panels carved with name and title of
Barkūk. L 0.40 - 52. Three carved panels. Modern. (From the
Delta.) L 0.32 - 53. Small carved panel. L 0.18
- 54. Panel of ceiling carved and painted with birds
and human beings, one of whom drinks from a
cup. (Māristān of Kalāūn, 1284.) L 0.39 - 55. Table (kursy) of
six sides with carved or turned
panels, and stalactite
cornice. H 0.93

Carved Side Of A
Sheykh's Tomb. 1216 A.D.
- 56. Table (kursy) with
ebony panels carved with
arabesques and edged with ivory.
(Mosque El-Azhar.)
H 0.98; repaired. - 57. Table of wood inlaid with mosaics of ivory, tin,
ebony, etc. H 0.78 - 58. Table, similar mosaics. (Mosque of El-Ghūry.)
H 1.11 - 59. Table, similar mosaics. (Mosque of Sha'bān,
1368.) H 1.17 - 60. Table, similar mosaics, with arched opening
keyed with ebony and ivory, and with medallions
on the springs bearing arms, on a fess a
lozenge. H 0.72
- 61. Desk of wood veneered with mother-of-pearl.
Syrian? H 1.00 - 62. Prayer-niche (mihrāb) of carved wood set in
rectangular framework
of small carved panels
arranged in geometrical patterns;
on the back
and sides, some panels are carved with a
vase
from which rise stems bearing fruit and
flowers.
(Chapel of Seyyida Rukeyya, c. 1135.) H
2.10

IV. 64. Panelled
Door Of Ashrafīya, 1423
- 63. Settle of turned wood. (House of Wakf El-Araby.)
H 1.15 - 64. Leaves of a door of panelled wood inlaid with ivory
and ebony. (Mosque of El-Ashraf, 1423.) H 1.98

IV. 62. Mihrāb Of
Seyyida Rukeyya. XIIITH Century
- 65. Korān-case, six-sided, of wood covered inside and
out with delicate mosaics, divided inside into
three compartments, each with ten grooves, to
hold the 30 ajzā or
divisions of the Korān; the
hinges are of bronze incrusted
with silver and
gold. (Mosque of Sha'bān.) L 0.71

IV. 66. Filigree
Bronze Lantern. XIVTH CENTURY

- 66. Octagonal lantern in filigree bronze, with
fleur-de-lis
lozenge in centre of geometrical
designs;
on the top, in hammered brass, a crescent.
(Mosque of Suyurghātmish, 1356.) H 1.90 - 67. Nine stucco and stained glass window-lights.
H 0.82–74 - 68, 69. Two boards, panelled in geometrical patterns,
and carved. (Mosque of El-Muayyad, 1420.)
H 1.90, 2.00 - 70. Wooden frieze, divided into panels with benedictory
kufic inscriptions, separated by stars.
L 1.36 - 71, 72. Boards carved with ornaments and kufic
Korān inscriptions. L 1.55 - 73. Board covered with carved ornament and inscriptions.
L 1.77 - 74. Part of a board painted with white letters on
red ground. L 0.70 - 75. Board panelled and carved, with gilt fleur-de-lis
carved in a medallion, verse from Korān painted
in the larger panels, and painted borders. L 2.15 - 76. Board painted with ornaments, inscriptions, and
patterns. L 1.72 - 77. Part of a painted board. L 1.50 (Nos. 73–77
are from the Mosque of El-Muayyad.) - 78. Board carved with inscriptions on both sides,
taken from the Korān, except the second line
of the obverse, which commemorates the foundation
of the tomb by Sultān Farag:–
(Tomb-mosque of Barkūk, 1405–1410.)
L. 1.63 - 79. 80. Portions of carved board. (Mosque of
El-Muayyad.)
L 0.70, 1.00

- 81, 82. Carved boards from covering of a ceiling
joist. (Mosque of El-Muayyad.) L 1.16 - 83–89. Seven panels carved with inscription in
relief:–
‘This was dedicated by our lord
the Sultān El-Melik en-Nāsir Farag b. Barkūk.’
(Tomb-mosque of Barkūk.) L 0.72 - 90. Carved board. L 1.80
- 91, 92. Friezes carved with sunk ornaments.
(Mosque of El-Muayyad.) L 1.10, 1.23 - 93. Board carved with geometrical patterns.1 L 2.05
1 Nos. 68, 77,
79, 80, 91, 93 were found upon the ceiling
of the
līwān of the mosque of El-Muayyad during the
repairs
of 1889, but certainly did not belong originally to
the mosque. They were apparently thrown over the ceiling
to fill up holes, and may have come from some private
house or palace, as their propitiatory inscriptions would lead
us to suppose.
- 94. Piece of a board carved with ornaments of the
earliest period. (Tract of ‘Ayn es-Sīra, south of
Cairo.) L 0.57 - 95. Panel carved with inscription recording erection
of tribune (dikka) in
tomb-mosque of Barkūk
by Sultān Kāït-Bey, and with
medallion carved
and inscribed in honour of Kāït-Bey, in
three
lines. (From the tribune referred to, late xv
c.)
L 2.43 - 96. Panel carved with inscription commemorating
restoration (tejdīd)
of the mosque El-Azhar by
Kāït-Bey, xv c. (El-Azhar.) L
0.82 - 97. Carved piece. L 1.03
- 98. Board ornamented with symmetrical arabesques.
L 1.42 - 99. Carved board with traces of gilding. L 1.79
[Back to top]
ROOM VI.
Pottery

The potter's art was
assiduously cultivated in Egypt
from very early times, and it
was certainly not
allowed to deteriorate during the
Mohammadan
period. To quote Nāsir-i-Khusrau again, the
eleventh century traveller found that at
Cairo all
sorts of faïence were made,
and some so thin and
transparent that you could see your hand
through it;
whilst another kind had a metallic lustre, the
shade of
which changed according to the point of view.
1 The
traditions of ancient Egypt and of Greek and
Roman
examples, and the influence of Persian ceramic
art,
all contributed to the variety and beauty of Arab
pottery. Almost a history of the art could be traced
by means of the numerous fragments, from the
commonest domestic crockery to the finest decorative
work,
daily picked up among the rubbish mounds
which mark the site
of the old city of Fustāt (near
‘
Old Cairo’), and
whence connoisseurs, especially
Dr. Fouquet of
Cairo, have accumulated very interesting
and beautiful collections. Sometimes these
fragments have the baking cockspur still sticking to
them
(e.g. no. 145), a conclusive proof of native
manufacture, to
which may be added the numerous
wasters found among the
rubbish heaps. Among
1
Sefer Nameh, trans. Ch. Schefer, p. 151.

the most
interesting fragments are the many which
exhibit inscriptions
or armorial bearings, and thus
enable us to arrive at their
date. The arms are often
the same as those found on
metal-work, glass lamps
etc., such as the lion, two-headed
eagle, cup, lozenge,
etc.; and a careful classification of
these indications
with reference to dated examples in other
arts would
go some way towards making a foundation for the
history of medieval Arab pottery. Among these
fragments some are glazed faïence others are merely
baked
earthenware of a hard unglazed paste, often
stamped with marks
indicating probably the capacity
of the vessel. The glazed
faïence forms a rich series
worthy of more careful study than
it has hitherto
received. As an entrepōCt of commerce between
East
and West, Egypt naturally received influences from
all sides, and there is no doubt that certain oft-repeated
designs (see nos. 135 and 138) must be
derived from China, whence also came the undoubtedly
Chinese
celadon or sea-green glaze which
had a great attraction for
Egyptian potters (see no.
144). This celadon ware, which was
preserved in
families from generation to generation, is
known
throughout Egypt by the name of
Ghur, which may
be derived from the
well-known Sultan of the beginning
of the XVIth c. who built
so many monuments
and often employed faïence for their
decoration
The fragments of vases in which an opaque enamel
formed the glaze often bear on the bottom an artist's
signature, e.g.

made by El-Misry
[the Cairene'],

made by the
Master,'


made by Esh-Sha'my [the Syrian'], or

made by
the son of Esh-Shamy; '
or such names as

Gheyby, and

Ghazzāl.
The Arabs, unlike the Persians, made but a sparing
use of wall-tiles in their decoration; but this is
explained,
no doubt, by their preference for marble,
which was readily
obtained in Egypt or near by,
and which in the form of mosaic
produced a richer
effect than tiles could give. In this
preference they
followed the Romans. As a matter of fact the
only
monuments of Arab rule in Egypt which are
decorated with tiles are the minarets of the mosque
of En-Nāsir in the citadel (1318), the tomb of Tāshtemir
the Cupbearer (1334), and the tomb called
that of the Khawand Baraka, of about the same
date, the last
two in the Eastern Cemetery or so-called
'Tombs of the
Caliphs.' In the minarets of
En-Nāsir the tiles are of single
colours, white,
brown, and green, and cover up the
roughly-hewn
stones of the upper stage. The cupola of
Tāshtemir
has a band of green tiles in the drum. That
known
by the name of Khawand Baraka (though it is not
her tomb) has on its cupola a course of tiles forming
an inscription, the upper edge of which is emphasized
by a shoulder crowned with merlons. The
large white letters stand boldly out of the ground,
which is
of two shades of green, and set off by
foliage in dark brown
faïence. The ensemble of
letters, foliage, etc., has the appearance of a mosaic
of
irregular joints, which may almost be compared
to the effect
of a cyclopean wall.

We have to skip a century and a half before we
find
another monument with this characteristic.
The visitor to the
Museum will be struck by the
large plaques of tiles barred by
great white letters
on a blue ground. These letters are of
unusual
excellence, and formed on so large a scale that
they
cover two courses of tiles. The ornaments which
fill up the intervals have the true Arab
cachet. The
registers state that they
came from the tomb of El-Ghūry,
and if they really belonged to
it they probably
formed a band round the dome, like those
already mentioned. The present dome is a wooden
erection set up by Franz Pasha, about fourteen
years ago; but we learn from Prisse d'Avennes,
1 that the original dome, which was shaken by an
earthquake and had to be demolished, was ornamented
outside, first by squares of blue faïence, like
the minaret [
scil. the
minaret of El-Ghūry's collegiate
mosque, opposite the
tomb-mosque which had no
minaret], then by a band of
inscription, and finally by
little blue and white imitation
windows fixed between
the windows of the dome. Among a heap of
waste
sherds I found a piece of faïence, no. 328, which
I
have placed over no. 273, of which it is the
complement
in colour of glaze, ornaments, and character
of
inscription. These fragments apparently formed
part of one of those commemorative tablets which in
the XIV and XV cc. were often set up in the name
of some Sultān; and in this case the Sultān's name

is El-Ghūry.
This and other evidence makes it
clear that in the tiles
mentioned above, and notably
those of the tomb of El-Ghūry, we
see a native manufacture.
It should be noticed that only one
or two
colours are used in these Egyptian tiles.
It was only when Egypt came under 'Othmānly
rule
that tiles became fashionable for architectural
decoration, on
the walls of mosques, houses, and
especially the combined
street-fountain (
sebīl) and
school (
kuttāb) which is a prominent
object in
Turkish building. The mosque of Aksunkur (1347)
restored in 1652 by Ibrāhīm
Aga Mustahfazān, and
the mosque of the Amīr
Sheykhū (1355), have
sometimes been cited as examples of the
early use
of wall-tiles: but a glance at the latter will
show
that the tiles are mixed up without any method
with
the remains of the original marble mosaic work,
and
there is no doubt that the tiles which line the
līvān of Aksunkur were placed there by the
restorer
Ibrāhīm āga. The tiles of both mosques, too,
are
not of the simple Arab style; they are Turkish—
Prisse d'Avennes classed them conveniently [but we
know not on what authority] as Kutahia ware. Of
course, in time Egypt learned to manufacture tiles in
the Turkish style, yet with an individual character—
e.g. at
Rosetta; but
the art has long fallen into
decay (witness the mihrāb of the
mosque of Sitta
Nefisa at
Cairo dated 1171 A.H. = 1757), the kilns
burnt
out, and in the present century imported
tiles from Italy (see
no. 252) have been employed in
decoration.
A. Unglazed
Earthenware
Room VI.
- 1. Cup. D 0.17
- 2. Cup. D 0.15
- 3. Cup. (Mosque of El-Ghūry.) D 0.14
- 4. Cup, with signs of glaze inside. D 0.11
- 5. Tall vessel. H 0.15
- 6. Small vessel. H 0.04
- 7—9. Water-jars. (Mosque of El-Ghūry.) H 0.08—0.12
- 10, 11. Lamps. H 0.13, 0.12
- 12, 13. Pipes. H 0.03
- 14. Brick. (Masr el-'Atīka.) L 0.15
- 15, 16. Greek fire grenades, stamped with name
Mohammad. H 0.11 - 17—34. Eighteen fragments of vessels with various
marks. (Given by Dr. Fouquet.) - 35. Vessel in shape of quadruped. (Given by Dr.
Fouquet.) L 0.14 - 36. Jug with ovoid base. H 0.37
- 37, 38. Amphoras with pointed base. (Mosque of
Imām Esh-Shāfi'y.) H 0.55, 0.60 - 39. Jug with spherical base. H 0.37
- 40. Jug with flattened base. H 0.21
- 41. Talisman (higāb) with stamped inscriptions.
D 0.06
B. Glazed Pottery
- 42—59. Eighteen lamps. L 0.09—0.12
- 60. Globe for lamp-chain, of terra cotta with yellow
enamel. (Mosque of wife of Kāit-Bāy in the
Fayyūm.) D 0.11 - 61, 62. Globes of glazed pottery with blue flowers
on
white ground. D 0.22 - 63. Bottom of dish, white enamel, blue and black
ornament, inscription outside. (Mosque of El-
Ghūry.) - 64. Dish with moulded border in various colours.
D 0.38

- 65. Piece of a plate with inscription. D 0.20
- 66. Lamp, coloured decoration on opaque white
ground, inscription from Korān, date 1155 A.H. =
1745. H 0.45 - 67. Lamp, blue, green, and yellow ornaments on
white ground. H 0.29 - 68. Lamp, blue and green decoration on white
enamel. (Mosque of Seyyid El-Bedawy, at
Tanta.) H 0.23 - 69. Lamp, blue decoration on white ground. (Same
provenance.) H 0.22 - 70. Lamp of terra cotta covered with turquoise blue
enamel. (Mosque of Sultan Hasan.) H 0.30 - 71. Large vessel of terra cotta, glazed, and
decorated
with a network of lines. Evidently made
in several
distinct zones. (Mosque El-Azhar.) H 0.91 - 72. Cup glazed inside. D 0.06
- 73—80. Fragments of glazed pottery: 73, 74,
inscriptions;
L 0.07. 75, armorial bearing, a
sword on an escutcheon, and inscription; L 0.08.
76, inscription; L 0.07. 77, fleur-de-lys; D 0.07.
78, white glaze upon terra cotta, on bottom

Gheyby; D 0.09. 79, similar, on bottom

Ghazzāl; D 0.03. 80, foliate ornament of
Arab
character; L 0.09. (Given by M. Herz
Bey, 1893.) - 81—166. Objects and fragments of pottery: 81—
108, fragments, opaque white glaze; 135, design
resembling porcelain fragment no. 318; 144,
green glaze of celadon class; fragment with
cockscomb still attached which supported
another object in the kiln; 157, cup, white
glaze, D 0.13; 158, 159, cups, D 0.16, 0.11; - 160—162, small vessels, H 0.07—0.10; 163, 164,
camps, H 0.09; 165, blue glaze, D 0.03; 166,
saucer. D 0.04 (Given by Dr. Fouquet, 1893.)
- 167. Plaque representing the Haram and Kaaba at
Mecca, in perspective, with inscription stating
it was made by Mohammad Esh-Shamy (the
Syrian) in 1139 A.H. = 1726. L 0.45 
VI. 167. The
Kaaba In Tilework
- 168—177. Ten enamelled tiles with ornament derived
from the violet. L 0.25
- 178. Piece of enamelled border. H 0.13
- 179—181. Four pieces of a spandrel. L 0.25
- 182—185. Five enamelled tiles, white ornament on
blue ground. L 0.24 - 186, 187. Two fragments of wall-tiles, enamelled in
red, blue, and green, on white ground. H 0.14,
0.17 - 188—190. Three tiles enamelled with two shades of
blue on white ground. L 0.25

VI. 172. Enamelled Tile
- 191. Plaque containing a portion of a panel and
frame. L 0.25 - 192—195. Four oblong tiles, with blue, grey, and
green ornament on white ground. L 0.19 - 196. Tile with grey and blue ornament in several
shades. L 0.19 - 197—199. Three tiles with white and green ornament
on blue ground. L 0.13—0.15 - 200—212. Thirteen tiles. L 0.10—0.23 poor work.
- 213, 214. Two pieces: a panel in white bordered by
blue and green ornament. L 0.25 poor work. - 215—228. Fourteen tiles of good workmanship.
L 0.11—0.25

- 229, 230. Two tiles (one imperfect) with interlacing
border in relief.1 (Mosque of
Khōshkadam
El-Ahmady.) L 0.06, 0.10 1 Similar tiles are in
the mosque of Sheykhū. They resemble
those of
Spain, whence they were probably imported.
- 231—235. Five panels formed of fifty tiles,
representing
a flower growing out of a vase.
(House
of Nefūsa Gasūsa, modern.) L 0.79 - 236—247. Twelve tiles. Modern. L 0.20
- 248—252. Tiles with naturalistic designs:—an insect,
cyprus, foliage, and flowers. European. - 253—271. Nineteen tiles with white letters on blue
ground forming the kalima or profession of faith
and pious
formulas. - 272. Large arched panel composed (now) of fourteen
small tiles, on which are inscriptions in white
letters outlined in green on blue ground, framed
in border of white on green. - 273. Part of a panel containing medallion in honour
of a sultān, white on blue. - 274. Piece identical with lower part of preceding no.
- 275—292. Eighteen enamelled tiles with blue letters
and ornaments outlined with white on blue
ground; the letters extend over two courses
of tiles. - 293—308. Forty enamelled tiles with white
inscription
extending over two courses, and
white
ornaments of pure Arab style, on blue
ground.
(Dome, demolished 1860, of Tomb-mosque
of
El-Ghūry, 1503.) - 309. Fragment of brown tile with white inscription
and green foilage. (Dome of Khawand Baraka,
xiv. c.) - 310—313. Part of cornice of frieze. (Same
provenance.)
- 314—317. Tiles, four green, five white, two brown
(dark and light), from north minaret of mosque
of Sultān En-Nāsir Mohammad in the Citadel,
1318.
C. Porcelain
- 318. Part of a porcelain vessel, white, with bright
blue foilage. (Rubbish heaps.) - 319—322. Four celadon vases. (Mosque of Sultān
Hasan.) - 323. Twenty-three blue enamel beads.
Miscellaneous
- 324. Stone lamp. Given by Dr. Schweinfurth.
- 325. Plaster cup.
- 326. Carnelian dish, with edges raised, cut in
facets.
(Mosque of Kalāūn.) A precious example
of
the work in crystal and precious stones
chiefly
known only from medieval historians and
travellers. - 327. Modern lantern.
[Back to top]