deposit_your_work

Defining complexity: Historical reconstruction and Nyulnyulan subordination

Files in this item

Files Size Format View
Bowern_RWP.pdf 146.0Kb application/pdf Thumbnail

Show simple item record

Item Metadata

dc.contributor.author Bowern, Claire
dc.date.accessioned 2009-02-11T22:40:05Z
dc.date.available 2009-02-11T22:40:05Z
dc.date.issued 2009-02-11T22:40:05Z
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/1911/21848
dc.description.abstract I use data from subordination strategies in Nyulnyulan languages (Non-Pama-Nyungan, Northern Australia) in order to investigate various alternative means of defining and quantifying 'complexity'. While Edmonds (1999) defines 48 distinct types of complexity (concentrating on social and natural sciences), in this paper I concentrate on three facets of complexity: descriptive complexity, ontological complexity, and parsimony in reconstruction. While historical linguists tend to maximise parsimony, in Nyulnyulan languages the minimization of one aspect of complexity necessarily adds complication elsewhere, and it therefore serves as an appropriate case study of the interdependencies between ontology, syntactic modelling, and language change.
dc.language.iso en
dc.subject linguistics, language, complexity, subordination, Nyulnyulan, diachrony, language change
dc.title Defining complexity: Historical reconstruction and Nyulnyulan subordination
dc.type Article
dc.identifier.citation Bowern, Claire. (2009). "Defining complexity: Historical reconstruction and Nyulnyulan subordination."

The following license files are associated with this item:

This item appears in the following Collection(s)